» Press Releases

Defending Human Rights at the UN Human Rights Council
By Cuban Democratic Directorate

Chinese dissident Yang Jianli and Directorio's Director of International Relations, John Suarez.

Chinese dissident Yang Jianli and Directorio's Director of International Relations, John Suarez.

 New York. May 20, 2011. Cuban Democratic Directorate. A coalition of pro-human rights NGOs including Geneva-based UN Watch, the Lantos Foundation for Human Rights and Justice, Cuban Democratic Directorate, and Initiatives for China, which is headed by former Chinese prisoner of conscience Yang Jianli, presented recommendations on elections for candidates to the UN Human Rights Council during a briefing held at the United Nations in New York on May 19, 2011.

The voting recommendations were submitted yesterday in a report to the New York missions of UN member states by the Geneva-based UN Watch, the Lantos Foundation for Human Rights and Justice, Directorio, and Initiatives for China, which is headed by former Chinese prisoner of conscience Yang Jianli.

A Congo, Kuwait and Nicaragua failed to meet the membership criteria, while the qualifications of India, Indonesia, Philippines and Burkina Faso were "questionable." Click here for full report PDF.

The rights groups and dissidents held the briefing in order to lobby for an improved council membership. Current members include non-democracies such as China, Saudi Arabia, Cuba, Russia, Bahrain and Pakistan. 

"Congo, Kuwait and Nicaragua have poor records in respecting the basic human rights of their own citizens," said UN Watch executive director Hillel Neuer, "and they have consistently voted the wrong way on UN initiatives to promote and protect the human rights of others."

"As an observer state in recent UN human rights council sessions, Nicaragua strongly praised the governments of Libyan dictator Moammar Qaddafi and Syrian dictator Bashar Assad, attempting to shield them from scrutiny. It will be an insult to their victims -- and a defeat for the global cause of human rights -- if the UN now elects Nicaragua as one of the council's 47 voting members."

The report also called on India, Indonesia, Philippines and Burkina Faso to pledge improvements prior to the Friday vote. The report documents how India last year refused to support UN resolutions for human rights victims in Iran, Burma, and North Korea, and failed to join other democracies and human rights groups in opposing a UN resolution prohibiting criticism of Islam, which experts said restricted freedom of speech.

The report found that 10 of the 17 candidates are qualified: Austria, Benin, Botswana, Chile, Costa Rica, Czech Republic, Georgia, Italy, Peru, and Romania.


---


The Cuban Democratic Directorate's Director of International Relations, John Suarez, presented the following remarks during the briefing:



What are the consequences of a country with questionable credentials having a seat on the UN Human Rights Council (UNHRC)? The answer is found in Cuba's tenure on the Council which ends in 2012. In addition to membership on the UNHRC one of the vice-presidents is Rodolfo Reyes Rodriguez, the ambassador of the Cuban dictatorship.

The Castro regime's tenure on the Human Rights Council has harmed the Council. A few high profile incidents will dramatize some of the damage done:

The non-invitation invitation of Manfred Nowak, the UN special rapporteur on torture, by the Cuban Ambassador and the Cuban Minister of Justice in January of 2009 to visit Cuba later that same year. Only to be put off without notice again and again through 2009 and 2010 leading to this expert missing opportunities to visit other countries caught. Incidentally, the last time the Cuban government permitted the International Committee of the Red Cross to visit Cuban prisons was 1989. The previous time was 1959.

On February 2, 2009 during the Universal Periodic Review of China the then Cuban Ambassador, Juan Antonio Fernandez Palacios encouraged the Chinese regime to repress human rights defenders in China with more firmness.

On May 28, 2009 the amidst a human rights crisis in Sri Lanka the Cuban government's diplomats took the lead and successfully blocked efforts to address the wholesale slaughter there.


Now the argument made by some UN officials is that having countries with systematic human rights violations on the Council offers them an exposure to human rights that changes them for the better. In practice, the opposite appears to be the case. The Human Rights Council did not change these regimes. They've changed the Human Rights Council for the worse.

In the case of Cuba during their tenure on the Council human rights continue to be systematically violated. On February 23, 2010 Orlando Zapata Tamayo, a human rights defender, died after a long hunger strike during which over a period of 18 days he was denied water by prison officials contributing to his death. On May 5, 2011 human rights defender Juan Wilfredo Soto was beaten up in a public park by the political police and died three days later on May 8, 2011.

Acts of repudiation organized by Cuban State Security and physical assaults against dissidents remains standard practice and have increased both in frequency and brutality.

In 2004 in the old UN Human Rights Commission after losing a vote, a young Cuban diplomat physically assaulted a 60 year old man - who was part of the American delegation - attacking him from behind in front of numerous eyewitnesses. Despite this the Cuban dictatorship was elected as a member on the new UN Human Rights Council.

As Katrina Lantos Swett citing Adlai Stevenson stated earlier: "Solutions begin by telling the truth." Many do not take the UN Human Rights Council seriously because it lacks an enforcement mechanism, but nevertheless telling the truth is important in and of itself and is powerful.

Saving the Human Rights Council by at least naming and shaming serious human rights violators and demanding that States in the General Assembly take seriously the importance of voting new members onto the UN Human Rights Council who respect human rights would be two important first steps. This is why it is so important that Congo, Kuwait and Nicaragua not be voted onto the Human Rights Council. The alternative which has been observed over the past five years is a trivialization of the Human Rights Council by those regimes that have a vested interest in its failure.


###

Send by E-mail | Printable Version

 


About the author


Directorio Democrático Cubano Cuban Democratic Directorate

 

Directorio Democrático Cubano
P.O. Box 110235
Hialeah, Florida 33011
Tel. 305-220-2713
info@directorio.org

© Copyright 2006 Directorio Democrático Cubano. All rights reserved.